Home » BFL » Skirt Project – Blue Faced Leicester Sampling

Skirt Project – Blue Faced Leicester Sampling

It seems like it’s been ages since I have done a blog post and I suppose it has. I’ve been super busy and trying to figure some things out with this current skirt.

So, let me bring you up to speed if you haven’t been following along.

This skirt will be Blue Faced Leicester spun from top that I bought from Spunky Eclectic in the Calypso colorway. The last fabrics were slightly heavier than I wanted. Well, they are great for winter skirts but much too warm for year round wear. My ultimate goal is fabric about the weight of wool suiting. I expect I’ll get there by the time I’m seventy…

Anyway, This skirt started as one idea and has changed over the time I was spinning the yarn. The reason for the change is the same reason this project keeps morphing; I keep asking questions and need answers.

 

So, I decided in the midst of the spinning that I wanted to use singles for the weft rather than the 2 ply I had originally planned. The thing about the singles was that I wasn’t sure how to finish the singles before weaving with them and so I needed to do some sampling.

I had just under 9000 yards of 2 ply yarn already spun so I was ready to go. (If you’re wondering, the 2 ply is about 3100 yards per pound).

The singles for the weft are all still on bobbins so I’m not sure exactly how many yards of singles I have but I still have about 8 ounces of fiber that can be spun. Th

The original plan was to make a 36 inch wide fabric that was 10 yards on the loom but I knew I needed to do some sampling. To avoid having to spin thousands more yards of 2 ply I decided to change the skirt design to be similar to the first 2 skirts – a six gore skirt. That cuts down on the width of fabric needed.

I put a 15 yard 2 ply warp on the loom that was 24 inches wide. The 2 ply yarn was approximately 21 wraps per inch and I sett it at 24 epi. (The last skirts were about 18wpi two ply sett at 20 epi.)

 

I made 4 samples. 

  1. I used yarn right off the bobbin with no finishing.
  2. I wound yarn onto a PVC niddy noddy and soaked the yarn on the niddy and let it dry so it was blocked.
  3. I wound the yarn onto a niddy but then removed it from the niddy and soaked it relaxed and allowed it to dry in that relaxed state.
  4. I used 2 ply as weft for one of the samples for comparison with the singles samples.

So, I made the samples and I finished them by soaking them for about 15 minutes in hot water with a bit of Soak Wash. After they soaked I turned on the agitator and checked the samples after 5 minutes and then allowed them to agitate for another 5 minutes – 10 minutes total.

After the soak and agitation, I let the water spin out and I put the samples in the dryer with a towel for 5 minutes. I removed them from the dryer and they were still a bit damp. I pressed the samples with a hot iron until they were pretty dry. I laid them flat to dry the rest of the way.

And now it’s time to make a decision. I have photos and I’ll try to describe how they feel. Although I wish you all could come and touch them..

The photo above is from the singles that were not finished in any way before weaving. The left sample is the unfinished/right off the loom fabric and the one on the right is the finished fabric. The photo shows a bit of tracking but that isn’t obvious when you look at it in person. The hand is nice and drapey even though this on was a bit stiff or firm with very little drape. The measurements of this sample before finishing was 12″x11.75″. After finishing it is 11.5″x10.5″. There was a lot of shrinkage on this sample which I definitely expected because the weft was not preshrunk by soaking or washing.

This sample is the one that was woven with the blocked singles. The unfinished fabric  is less stiff than the one from the yarn right off the bobbin but the hand of the finished fabric is very similar to the last. The original size of this sample was 14″x11.5″ with the size after finishing being 13″x10.25″  So it has about the same shrinkage as the yarn directly off the bobbin. This makes sense logically.

This sample is the one that was woven with the yarn that was washed and then allowed to dry in its relaxed state. This sample showed a lot of tracking on the whole width and length of the fabric. This is not the look I’m going for in this project but It’s interesting to see it and know that if I wanted a fabric with some added texture this might be a good choice for weaving. It’s also a bit fuzzier and has less drape. The original sample was 11″x11″ and the finshed piece is 10″x10.25″.  So less shrinkage than the first two but it isn’t the fabric that I’m looking for.

Just for the sake of science I’ll show the 2 ply weft sample:

This fabric is lovely, no tracking at all. The original measurements were 12″x9.5″ and the finished measurement was 11.25″x9.25″. Definitely less shrinkage. It feels a bit thicker which makes sense and has a bit less drape than the samples with the singles weft.

Let me know what you would do but I’m thinking that weaving with yarn right off the bobbin is going to be the choice. It will be less work than the samples with the washed yarns and it gives a lovely fabric even though there is plenty of shrinkage.

The loom is sett at 24″ wide total and with draw in after weaving is about 22.5 inches before finishing. So I can probably plan on at least a 20.5 inch wide finished fabric to use for my project. And because I made samples smaller than the original plan I think I will have at least 11 yards of fabric after finishing. I wonder if that’s enough for a dress…short sleeves of course.

I’m excited to hear what you think….

8 Responses so far.

  1. Sara Lamb says:

    if you weave with yarn right off the bobbin, I would alternate wheel
    bobbins/shuttle bobbins to minimize any variation is twist amount from spinning bobbin to spinning bobbin.

    In other words, spin two bobbins, wind shuttle bobbins from each, and alternate those shuttle bobbins in the weft. yes, two shuttles running at a time.

    Am I just paranoid? Maybe. Can you spin consistently from one end of the project to the other? Maybe. There is no guarantee this will prevent differential shrinkage, but …it’s what the researchers found happened in cloth from Greenland, see Woven Into The Earth. :D! Also? that book by some woman, the purple wool samples.

  2. Nancie says:

    I’m biased (ha ha) I weave a lot with singles straight from the wheel. Bluster Bay even makes a shuttle that holds charhka spindles.

    One thing to look at on your samples is the stretch. One amazing thing you gain by weaving with singles, especially handspring singles, is the ability to create stretchable wovens. The amount of stretch will depend on the twist in your singles and the weave structure, twill will stretch more than tabby, more twist, more stretch… You get the idea. Even your lower twist singe weft fabric should have some “give” to it that the fabric with the plied weft just doesn’t have.

    I’m garment construction, that bit of stretch can be very nice to have in making something have a perfect fit while still being really comfortable.

    • Beth says:

      That’s good to know! Have you used singles in the warp? Does that add more stretch?

    • Susan says:

      As long as you are running two shuttles to achieve consistency, what if one were filled with singles spun in the other direction? (One S and one Z) Would that reduce or eliminate all tracking? I imagine it’s not something Beth wants to hear if it calls for even more spinning…

      • Beth says:

        Holy crap! That’s an awesome question. I’m going to add it to my list of samples that need to be made.
        I will say that it would need to make a giant difference because I hate spinning singles S.

  3. Susan says:

    It’s not clear to me why you have sett 21 wpi yarn at 24 epi. Is it because you want the striping effect of a warp faced fabric made from variegated yarn? Maybe you covered this in a previous post. I’m thinking that a wider sett would make a drapier fabric.

    • Beth says:

      The reason for the close sett is because this fabric is for clothing and it needs to stand up to abuse. In addition it needs to hold at the seams. A looser sett doesn’t work as well based on my sampling with the Columbia.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *